-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathKeyFormulasSpec.tex
More file actions
91 lines (77 loc) · 2.75 KB
/
Copy pathKeyFormulasSpec.tex
File metadata and controls
91 lines (77 loc) · 2.75 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\HH}{\mathbb{H}}
\newcommand{\tcm}{\tau_{\mathrm{CM}}}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}
\newtheorem{keyformula}{Key Formula}
\title{\bf Two Key Identities for Formal Verification}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
The companion paper reinterprets the Bruinier--Ono finite formula for the partition
number $p(n)$ through the geometry of elliptic curves with complex multiplication.
Two identities in this development are new and rest on algebraic manipulations specific to the
partition-theoretic setting. The remaining steps of the paper are either classical (the
theory of modular and weak Maass forms, complex multiplication, supersingular reduction, the
Watson--Atkin recursions) or elementary rearrangements. Accordingly, we single out only these
two identities for formal verification here; we do not attempt to formalize the paper as a
whole, and the classical inputs are used as established.
We verify these two identities because they are exactly the points at which a hidden sign,
constant, or normalization error could enter unnoticed, and where an independent machine check
therefore adds genuine assurance.
We work over $\C$. Both identities are equalities of complex numbers obtained by evaluating
certain functions at a fixed $\tau\in\HH$; only the values enter, so we introduce those values
directly.
\begin{defn}[Ground data]
Fix $y\in\R$ with $y>0$ (read as $y=\operatorname{Im}\tau$), and complex numbers
\[
E_2,\ E_4,\ E_6,\ F,\ DF,\ J \in \C,
\qquad
\Phi_Y,\ \Phi_{XX},\ \Phi_{XY},\ \Phi_{YY} \in \C,
\]
with $E_4\neq0$, $J\neq1728$, and $\Phi_Y\neq0$. Here $DF$ denotes the value of
$\tfrac{1}{2\pi i}F'$, and $\Phi_Y,\Phi_{XX},\Phi_{XY},\Phi_{YY}$ denote the values at the
diagonal point $(J,J)$ of the corresponding partial derivatives of the modular polynomial
$\Phi_N(X,Y)$, where $N=|\Delta_n|=24n-1$.
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}[Nonholomorphic completion]
\[
E_2^{*}\ :=\ E_2-\frac{3}{\pi\,y}.
\]
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}[Weight-$k$ operators]
For $k\in\mathbb{Z}$,
\[
\partial_k F\ :=\ DF-\frac{k}{4\pi\,y}\,F,
\qquad
\vartheta_k F\ :=\ DF-\frac{k}{12}\,E_2\,F.
\]
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}[Weak Maass value]
\[
P\ :=\ -\,\partial_{-2}F.
\]
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}[Diagonal CM tangent]
\[
\tcm(J)\ :=\ \frac{\Phi_{YY}-\Phi_{XY}}{\Phi_Y}.
\]
\end{defn}
\section*{The two key identities}
\begin{keyformula}\label{Formula1}
\[
P\ =\ -\,\vartheta_{-2}F\ +\ \tfrac16\,E_2^{*}\,F.
\]
\end{keyformula}
\begin{keyformula}\label{Formula2}
If $\Phi_{XX}=\Phi_{YY}$, then
\[
\frac{\tfrac12\Phi_{XX}-\Phi_{XY}+\tfrac12\Phi_{YY}}{\Phi_Y}
\ =\ \tcm(J).
\]
\end{keyformula}
\end{document}