Skip to content

Bring back explicit proof that CompHaus is epi-regular (or move parts into classification of epimorphisms) #302

Description

@dschepler

#273 has removed the proof that CompHaus is epi-regular. The problem is that the classification of its epimorphisms depends on it ("see the proof above that $CompHaus$ is epi-regular"). I think we need to bring it back.

It is unfortunate that these kind of dependencies are not formally tracked right now. cf #301

(Pasted from an email notification of a comment on that PR - creating an issue so we don't lose track of it.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions