Quality: Finalise documentation of Persistency

[PandaeDo]

To reach ML3 for Quality Management and Documentation Management we need to have at least one complete valid documentation. We want to archive this in Persistency by closing the following open topics:

• https://eclipse-score.github.io/persistency/main/docs/features/persistency/architecture/chklst_arc_inspection.html#doc__persistency_arc_inspection draft->valid
• https://eclipse-score.github.io/persistency/main/docs/manuals/security_manual.html#doc__persistency_security_manual draft->valid
• https://eclipse-score.github.io/persistency/main/score/kvs/docs/architecture/chklst_arc_inspection.html#doc__kvs_arc_inspection draft->valid
• https://eclipse-score.github.io/persistency/main/score/kvs/docs/detailed_design/index.html#doc__kvs_detailed_design draft->valid
  • https://eclipse-score.github.io/persistency/main/score/kvs/docs/detailed_design/chklst_impl_inspection.html#doc__kvs_impl_inspection draft->valid

ML3 is planned for S-CORE milestone 0.9.

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

Question here:

What from Infra / Docs-As-Code perspective are you still missing to fulfil these things?

[PandaeDo]

Question here:

What from Infra / Docs-As-Code perspective are you still missing to fulfil these things?

Nothing directly. It could be, that because of the ongoing work on process areas like implementations, therefore we might need support from Infra / Docs-As-Code. Combined with Persistency because this would be the pilot.

[umaucher]

so far I only would be aware that we need eclipse-score/docs-as-code#509 ... yes so the rest might be a bit "trail&error"