You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But note: the digest says "Issues Closed (last 24h)" and lists 10 items.
CI Status (latest runs on main):
One workflow ran: "Daily Project Digest" (success, as indicated by the absence of a failure mark? Actually, it shows a dash and then the link, but in the table it's written as:
The dash after the bullet is probably meant to be the status. In GitHub Actions, a successful run is shown with a green check, but here it's represented by a dash? However, the next two are marked as "skipped".
It seems the first one (Daily Project Digest) has no status word, but the dash might be a placeholder for success? However, in the context of the digest, we are to report CI status. Since the two Enhancement Guide runs are skipped, and the Daily Project Digest run doesn't have an explicit status, but note that the digest is being generated so it likely succeeded.
But wait: the issue #676 is "Daily Digest: 2026-06-20" and it was closed, meaning the digest for 2026-06-20 was generated and the workflow for today's digest (2026-06-21) is the one that just ran? And it's listed as the first CI run.
Given that the digest is being produced, we can assume the Daily Project Digest workflow succeeded. However, the representation is odd: it shows a dash and then an em dash? Actually, in the markdown it's:
The bullet point is "-", then a space, then an em dash " — ", then the title. This might be a formatting issue. But note that the next two have "skipped — ".
So, let's interpret:
The first run (Daily Project Digest) has no status word, but the dash after the bullet is the bullet, and then the em dash is part of the title? Actually, no: the title is "Daily Project Digest 2026-06-21T10:25:35Z", so the em dash is likely a separator that was intended to be the status.
Alternatively, in the source it might have been:
Daily Project Digest ... (but it's not)
Given the ambiguity, and since the digest is being generated, I'll assume the Daily Project Digest workflow succeeded. The two Enhancement Guide workflows were skipped.
Dependency Changes: None in the last 5 commits.
Now, let's structure the digest:
Highlights:
Released v0.13.0 with multiple fixes for XPath, pages, and Java actions.
Addressed several issues including dropped properties in dynamic text, combobox datasource, and reserved word handling in DESCRIBE.
One new issue reported: regression in v0.13.0 where enum literals in conditional expressions are mangled.
Code Changes (by theme):
Fixes for XPath handling:
Fixed quoted where '<xpath>' mis-storage (CE0161) [commit 3350f6d]
Total Open: The repository stats said "Open issues: 1", but note that we closed 10 and opened 1, so the net change is -9. However, the repo stats provided at the top say "Open issues: 1". This 1 is likely the current total open issues. So we can report:
New: 1
Closed: 10
Total Open: 1 (as per the repo stats)
Repository Health:
Stars: 94
Forks: 31
Watchers: 5
CI Status:
Daily Project Digest workflow: succeeded (implied by the digest being generated and the run being listed without a failure mark; the two Enhancement Guide workflows were skipped)
We are given a daily digest for 2026-06-21. We need to structure the response as:
Let's break down the provided data:
Repository Stats (as of the digest):
Commits (last 24h): 12 commits, all by Andrej Koelewijn except the merge commits (Ako). The commits are mostly fixes and a chore.
Pull Requests Merged (last 24h): None.
Pull Requests Opened (last 24h): None.
Currently Open PRs: Two PRs (#592 and #386) are still open.
Issues Opened (last 24h): One issue (#677) opened.
Issues Closed (last 24h): Eight issues closed (#676, #661, #657, #656, #650, #643, #642, #641, #627, #607) -> wait, the list shows 10 issues? Let me count:
where '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642, XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641, CONTAINER Visible expression produces CE0117 (needs repro; likely BSON serialization) #627, mxcli check acceptsdeclare list = emptybut Studio Pro rejects it (CE0053/CE0038) #607 -> 10 issues closed.But note: the digest says "Issues Closed (last 24h)" and lists 10 items.
CI Status (latest runs on main):
The first one (Daily Project Digest) has no status emoji? Actually, in the markdown it's written as:
But note: the first line has a dash and then an em dash? Actually, it's:
The dash after the bullet is probably meant to be the status. In GitHub Actions, a successful run is shown with a green check, but here it's represented by a dash? However, the next two are marked as "skipped".
Looking at the provided text:
It seems the first one (Daily Project Digest) has no status word, but the dash might be a placeholder for success? However, in the context of the digest, we are to report CI status. Since the two Enhancement Guide runs are skipped, and the Daily Project Digest run doesn't have an explicit status, but note that the digest is being generated so it likely succeeded.
But wait: the issue #676 is "Daily Digest: 2026-06-20" and it was closed, meaning the digest for 2026-06-20 was generated and the workflow for today's digest (2026-06-21) is the one that just ran? And it's listed as the first CI run.
Given that the digest is being produced, we can assume the Daily Project Digest workflow succeeded. However, the representation is odd: it shows a dash and then an em dash? Actually, in the markdown it's:
The bullet point is "-", then a space, then an em dash " — ", then the title. This might be a formatting issue. But note that the next two have "skipped — ".
So, let's interpret:
Alternatively, in the source it might have been:
Given the ambiguity, and since the digest is being generated, I'll assume the Daily Project Digest workflow succeeded. The two Enhancement Guide workflows were skipped.
Dependency Changes: None in the last 5 commits.
Now, let's structure the digest:
Highlights:
Code Changes (by theme):
Fixes for XPath handling:
where '<xpath>'mis-storage (CE0161) [commit 3350f6d]where '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642. The issue XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 is listed as closed but we don't see a commit for it in the last 24h. However, the digest only lists commits from the last 24h, so it's possible that the fix for XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 was in an earlier commit. But we are to summarize the last 24h commits.where '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642) and note that issue XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 (XPath with [%CurrentUser%]) is closed but not in the last 24h commits? Actually, the commit 3350f6d is for Quotedwhere '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642, and we don't see a commit for XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 in the list. But the issue XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 is closed in the last 24h, so it must have been fixed by one of the commits. Looking at the commits, we have:where '<xpath>'no longer mis-stored as CE0161 (Issue 642)Given the commits, we can note:
- Fixed XPath quoted where clause (issue Quoted
where '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642)- (Note: issue XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641 is closed but not directly tied to a commit in the last 24h in the provided list, so we might not mention it in code changes if we don't see the commit)
Fixes for Pages:
Fixes for Java Actions:
Fixes for Describe:
Other Fixes:
Documentation:
Pull Requests:
Issues:
where '<xpath>'mis-stores every constraint (CE0161); only inlinewhere [...]works #642, XPath constraint containing a [%…%] token (e.g. [%CurrentUser%]) fails CE0161 after apply #641, CONTAINER Visible expression produces CE0117 (needs repro; likely BSON serialization) #627, mxcli check acceptsdeclare list = emptybut Studio Pro rejects it (CE0053/CE0038) #607)Repository Health:
Action Items:
Now, let's write the digest concisely.
Note: We are to keep it concise.
Highlights:
Code Changes:
**Pull Requests
Daily digest generated automatically — workflow source