Skip to content

Question About Updated Masking BED Files for the Mpox Phylogenetic Workflow #369

Description

@dani-julian97

Hi,

First of all, thank you for the great work on the tool and for the continuous improvements you make to it.

I have a question regarding the masking file updates that were introduced last week (https://github.com/nextstrain/mpox/blob/master/nextclade/resources/clade-i/mask.bed). We use the phylogenetic workflow from Nextstrain for our Mpox analyses, and I noticed that the masking files used by the phylogenetic pipeline for clade I (and the other clades) do not appear to have been updated.

Would you recommend continuing to use the existing masking files, or should we update them to the new masking BED files to obtain more accurate results?

Our analyses are performed on independent batches of samples, so we do not need phylogenetic consistency between different batches. However, we would like to ensure that we are using the most appropriate masking strategy for each analysis.

Could you clarify whether the new masking BED files should now be adopted in place of the previous ones for the phylogenetic workflow?

Thanks in advance for your guidance.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions