Skip to content

chore: archive openspec changes for #256 #257#260

Closed
BANANASJIM wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/archive-openspec-256-257
Closed

chore: archive openspec changes for #256 #257#260
BANANASJIM wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/archive-openspec-256-257

Conversation

@BANANASJIM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@BANANASJIM, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 39 minutes and 36 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 06d71a06-416a-4ec4-baac-9f034402b05a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70aabfc and 27a14a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-256-vulkan-layer-manifest/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-256-vulkan-layer-manifest/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-256-vulkan-layer-manifest/test-plan.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-257-windows-arg-quoting/proposal.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-257-windows-arg-quoting/tasks.md
  • openspec/changes/archive/2026-06-22-fix-257-windows-arg-quoting/test-plan.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/archive-openspec-256-257

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@BANANASJIM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Moot: openspec/ was removed in its entirety by #261, so archiving the #256/#257 change dirs no longer applies.

@BANANASJIM BANANASJIM closed this Jun 23, 2026
@BANANASJIM
BANANASJIM deleted the chore/archive-openspec-256-257 branch July 1, 2026 03:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant