Skip to content

Reconcile headless control plane into GitHub history#16

Closed
hudsonaikins wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/github-main-reconciliation
Closed

Reconcile headless control plane into GitHub history#16
hudsonaikins wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/github-main-reconciliation

Conversation

@hudsonaikins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • preserve the local-only headless remote control-plane commit in GitHub
  • reconcile the one-commit gap between the former Forgejo main and GitHub main
  • restore GitHub pull requests as the canonical review and merge path

Why

After GitHub PR #15, development continued against Forgejo and local main advanced from aa19d20 to 76b6e77. Publishing that commit on a branch prevents history loss while the GitHub-first edge is completed.

Draft boundary

This PR is intentionally draft. Current configuration still reports Forgejo as the canonical remote and includes Forgejo/AWS deployment material. Do not merge until the GitHub-first provider/configuration adjustment lands and private workflow-ledger placement is verified.

Impact

  • GitHub main remains unchanged until review and merge
  • no Entire checkpoints, review refs, validation refs, deployments, or infrastructure changes are published
  • merged historical branch heads were removed separately from GitHub

Validation

  • npm run check
  • 80 tests passed
  • local commit 76b6e77 has GitHub main commit aa19d20 as its direct parent

@hudsonaikins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #17, which establishes GitHub as the sole hosted Git and review surface while keeping private control refs in the private GitHub control repository. Closing this reconciliation path without merge.

@hudsonaikins hudsonaikins deleted the codex/github-main-reconciliation branch July 15, 2026 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant