Tighten diagnose-issue evidence rules after the OK #8911 incident#1085
Open
PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Tighten diagnose-issue evidence rules after the OK #8911 incident#1085PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 1 commit into
PavelMakarchuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Adds hard filing requirements to /diagnose-issue (Critical Rules 5-9, Step 7 extraction how-tos, Step 9 pre-filing gate, root causes 12-13) and a session-wide summary in CLAUDE.md: - verbatim mechanical extraction required for every primary-source claim - negative claims need the full extracted section; year-change claims need both years diffed - quote scope (section/heading) must be verified, not just existence - engine outputs are hypothesis generators, never evidence - test expectations must trace to external ground truth, never the premise Born of pe-us #8830/#8911 (fabricated 2021-OK-form claim, reverted in #9009) and #8831/#8875 (real quote, wrong section, fixed by #8902). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Two of our own filings encoded false or mis-scoped primary-source claims:
A systematic audit of all June–July filings (16 items, 4 agents, verbatim re-extraction of every cited source) found no other fabrications — but both incidents share a gap the existing skill didn't close: citations were required, extraction wasn't.
What
.claude/commands/diagnose-issue.md:CLAUDE.md: session-wide six-rule summary so the requirements bind even outside/diagnose-issue.🤖 Generated with Claude Code