Updated documentation

[RiabushenkoA]

Updated documentation

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request releases version 1.0.13 of the GitLab app with project metadata updates and expanded connection documentation. The project version is incremented, the Visual Studio solution file is cleaned up and now tracks README.md, and the README provides structured setup instructions for three GitLab connection types.

Changes

Release and Documentation Updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Release metadata and solution structure Apps.GitLab/Apps.GitLab.csproj, GitLab.sln	Project version bumped to 1.0.13, Visual Studio version normalized by removing the "insiders" label, and README.md registered in the solution's Solution Items project section.
GitLab connection setup documentation README.md	GitLab connection instructions expanded with structured guidance for OAuth, OAuth Self-managed (with application registration, redirect URI, and client credentials steps), and Personal Access Token flows; earlier generic connection steps replaced.

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Updated documentation' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that do not convey meaningful information about the specific changes made in the changeset.	Provide a more specific title that describes the key documentation updates, such as 'Add GitLab connection documentation with OAuth and PAT options' or 'Document GitLab OAuth and Personal Access Token setup instructions'.
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description 'Updated documentation' is very vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that do not convey any meaningful information about what documentation was changed or why.	Expand the description to explain what documentation was updated (README.md), what new content was added (connection instructions for OAuth, OAuth Self-managed, and Personal Access Token), and the motivation for these changes.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch develop

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

64-110: ⚡ Quick win

Consider aligning action names with the coding guidelines for consistency.

Several actions in the documentation use "List" instead of "Search":

• Line 68: "List repositories" → Consider "Search repositories"
• Line 76: "List branches" → Consider "Search branches"
• Line 81: "List commits" → Consider "Search commits"
• Line 87: "List merge requests" → Consider "Search merge requests"

While the coding guidelines primarily target C# attribute values, they explicitly prefer "Search" over "List" for actions that return collections. Aligning the README with these conventions would improve consistency and match the user-facing display names in Blackbird.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` around lines 64 - 110, Update the action names in the README to
use "Search" instead of "List" for collection-returning actions to match coding
guidelines and Blackbird display names; specifically rename "List repositories"
→ "Search repositories", "List branches" → "Search branches", "List commits" →
"Search commits", and "List merge requests" → "Search merge requests" so the
README action headings match the preferred terminology.

Source: Coding guidelines

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 64-110: Update the action names in the README to use "Search"
instead of "List" for collection-returning actions to match coding guidelines
and Blackbird display names; specifically rename "List repositories" → "Search
repositories", "List branches" → "Search branches", "List commits" → "Search
commits", and "List merge requests" → "Search merge requests" so the README
action headings match the preferred terminology.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 871d616a-bd11-4c85-9067-464585d3f873

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74b657b and 3bd1274.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• image/README/1705402013379.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• Apps.GitLab/Apps.GitLab.csproj
• GitLab.sln
• README.md