Skip to content

Update req inspect #345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
PandaeDo wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Update req inspect #345

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d433943
update req inspect
PandaeDo Jul 15, 2026
b41c9ca
set status
PandaeDo Jul 16, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 10 additions & 3 deletions score/kvs/docs/requirements/chklst_req_inspection.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@

.. document:: KVS Requirements Inspection Checklist
:id: doc__kvs_req_inspection
:status: valid
:version: 1
:status: draft
:version: 2
:safety: ASIL_B
:security: YES
:realizes: wp__requirements_inspect[version==1]
Expand All @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Conduct

As described in the concept :need:`doc_concept__wp_inspections` the following "inspection roles" are expected to be filled:

- content responsible (author): `<https://github.com/sbachmann-qorix>`_
- content responsible (author):
- reviewer: `<https://github.com/aschemmel-tech>`_, `<https://github.com/umaucher>`_
- moderator: `<https://github.com/PandaeDo>`_
- test expert: <one of the reviewers explicitly named here, to cover REQ_08_01 as described>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -159,6 +159,13 @@ See also :need:`doc_concept__wp_inspections` for further information about revie
- :need:`comp_req__kvs__pers_data_csum` - defines part of safety mechanism, error reaction not needed
- :need:`comp_req__kvs__pers_data_csum_vrfy` defines part of safety mechanism, no error reaction defined
- https://github.com/eclipse-score/persistency/issues/297
* - REQ_10_01
- Is the requirement description *complete* ?
- For every requirement in the inspection, follow to its parent (feature) requirement(s) and then check if this/these are fulfilled completely by its/their linked children (component requirements, including those which are not in scope of the inspection).
-
-
-


The following requirements in "valid" state and with "inspected" tag set are in the scope of this inspection:

Expand Down
Loading