Restructure documentation to meet S-CORE conventions#123
Draft
BjoernAtBosch wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
License Check Results🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command: bazel run //:license-checkStatus: Click to expand output |
bffb6f4 to
bdd0af0
Compare
bdd0af0 to
f7a3b05
Compare
f7a3b05 to
5f687c4
Compare
5f687c4 to
7e93fb3
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I started this due to issue #40. Didn't know about #121 and #84 until today.
This PR assumes that Time is a single feature with components time, time_slave, and time_daemon (according to choosing option B of #121). It moves the documentation of the components to the
score/<component>/docs/detailed_designfolder as I assumed the components to too small as having the need for an architecture. (https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/blob/main/docs/contribute/general/folder.rst states regarding component architectures: "Component architecture (only if lower level components exist)".) Of course, we could decide differently and move it to the arch folder.It does not fully fit the demands state in #84.
So, I provide this a draft to share the work so far.