Skip to content

chore: gate CodeRabbit reviews behind the coderabbit label#15

Merged
jaysin586 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/coderabbit-label-gate
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

chore: gate CodeRabbit reviews behind the coderabbit label#15
jaysin586 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/coderabbit-label-gate

Conversation

@jaysin586

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Gates CodeRabbit auto-reviews behind the coderabbit label and stops per-push re-reviews, so simple fast-moving PRs no longer burn the hourly rate limit.

  • reviews.auto_review.enabled: false — no automatic review on every PR
  • reviews.auto_review.labels: ['coderabbit'] — adding the coderabbit label triggers a review (per CodeRabbit docs, the labels trigger works even when enabled is false)
  • reviews.auto_review.auto_incremental_review: false — pushes no longer re-trigger reviews

How to invoke a review now

  • Add the coderabbit label to the PR (created in this repo alongside this PR), or
  • Comment @coderabbitai review (incremental) / @coderabbitai full review on any PR

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Note: this repo had no .coderabbit.yaml, so the file is seeded from the org baseline (svelte-markdown) with the label gating applied. The path_instructions / labeling_instructions in the baseline are Svelte-package-oriented — trim if irrelevant here.

@coderabbitai ignore

Label-triggered reviews only; no per-push re-reviews. On-demand via @coderabbitai review still works.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jaysin586 jaysin586 added the skip-publish This is something important, but we dont want to publish it label Jul 8, 2026
@jaysin586 jaysin586 merged commit b7ee6ea into main Jul 8, 2026
1 check failed
@jaysin586 jaysin586 deleted the chore/coderabbit-label-gate branch July 8, 2026 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-publish This is something important, but we dont want to publish it

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant