Skip to content

🧪 [Add test coverage for get() method in store]#23

Merged
johnstrand merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
test-get-method-15727124686836624786
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

🧪 [Add test coverage for get() method in store]#23
johnstrand merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
test-get-method-15727124686836624786

Conversation

@johnstrand

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: Added tests for the get() method inside the createStore function in src/Squawk.ts, which was previously untested.
📊 Coverage: The new test file src/__tests__/Squawk.get.test.ts covers the happy path (verifying that get() returns the correct initial state) and the state after a store update.
Result: Improved test coverage and reliability of the get() method.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 15727124686836624786 started by @johnstrand

Co-authored-by: johnstrand <11484777+johnstrand@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@johnstrand johnstrand merged commit e55619f into master Jul 8, 2026
1 check passed
@johnstrand johnstrand deleted the test-get-method-15727124686836624786 branch July 8, 2026 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant