Two state Helmholtz Free Energy for T \neq 0 - #1478
Conversation
…ified further if T \neq 0, but I left it as a general result
|
Thank you for this PR, which will now be reviewed. If submitting to ./Physlib or ./QuantumInfo, please see our review guidelines if you are not familiar with the process. You should expect a back and forth with a reviewer before your PR is merged. See also that link for how to add appropriate labels to your PR. The PR will also go through a number of automated checks. You can learn more about these here, including how to run them locally. If you are submitting to ./PhyslibAlpha there will be a lighter review process, though your PR must still pass the automated checks. If you want to bring attention to this PR, please write a message on this thread of the Lean Zulip. Important: If a reviewer adds an |
jstoobysmith
left a comment
jstoobysmith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just one comment for this one
| ring | ||
|
|
||
| /-- An instance of `twoState_helmholtzFreeEnergy_eq` assuming T ≠ 0 -/ | ||
| lemma twoState_helmholtzFreeEnergy_eq_Tneq0 (E₀ E₁ : ℝ) (T : Temperature) (Th : T ≠ 0) : |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think twoState_helmholtzFreeEnergy_eq_T_neq_zero would be a better name for this(more fitting with convention)
jstoobysmith
added
the
ready-to-merge
2 participants
If Temperature is assumed nonzero, the lemma twoState_helmholtzFreeEnergy_eq can be simplified further