chore(deps-dev): bump number42_refactors from 13a356b to 0ee7760

[dependabot]

Bumps number42_refactors from 13a356b to 0ee7760.

Commits

• 0ee7760 chore(deps-dev): bump nx in the minor-and-patch group (#428)
• a61b1d5 fix(cross-file-extractors): drop the .Shared host (#426) (#427)
• 582b1ab fix(dogfood): make the full refactor suite converge on the whk-portal umbrell...
• ee5618b feat(near-clones): tree-agnostic TED core + Elixir-AST near-clone detection (...
• 0d88846 feat(heex): near-clone detection + merge into one parametrised component (tre...
• 1f7696b feat(convert-live-component-to-function): downgrade stateless live_component ...
• c744fec feat(split-root-conditional-component): split if-over-two-sigils into clauses...
• 5f5f398 fix(if-lift-to-clauses): keep the param binder when a branch is a ~H sigil (#...
• 9ece376 feat(remove-dead-private-function): prune directives orphaned by the removal ...
• 548e326 fix(unused-variable): guard case/fn/receive against non-list args (#361) (#385)
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Labels

The following labels could not be found: elixir. Please create it before Dependabot can add it to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

[github-actions]

Score: C+ → C+ | Δ -1 pts | 0 blocks flagged across 0 files | 0 modified, 0 added

🟠 Code Health: C+ (63/100)

196 files · codeqa-action · 2026-07-20

Combined metric scores use cosine similarity: +1 = metric profile perfectly matches healthy pattern for this behavior, 0 = no signal, −1 = anti-pattern detected. Mapped to 0–100 using breakpoints (approx: ≥0.5→A, ≥0.2→B, ≥0.0→C, ≥−0.3→D, <−0.3→F); actual letter grades use the full 15-step scale.

Metric Changes

Category	Base	Head	Δ
Readability	88.64	97.87	+9.23
Complexity	30.62	41.56	+10.93
Duplication	0.57	0.59	+0.02
Structure	6.23	9.17	+2.94

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
xychart-beta
    title "Code Health Scores"
    x-axis ["Readability", "Complexity", "Structure", "Duplication", "Naming", "Magic Numbers", "Combined Metrics"]
    y-axis "Score" 0 --> 100
    bar [94, 30, 88, 48, 96, 100, 65]

Loading

Readability       ███████████████████░   94  🟢 A
Complexity        ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░   30  🔴 D-
Structure         ██████████████████░░   88  🟢 A-
Duplication       ██████████░░░░░░░░░░   48  🟠 C-
Naming            ███████████████████░   96  🟢 A
Magic Numbers     ████████████████████  100  🟢 A
Combined Metrics  █████████████░░░░░░░   65  🔴 D

[github-actions]

🔍 Top Likely Issues (cosine similarity)

Most negative cosine = file's metric profile best matches this anti-pattern.

Behavior	Cosine	Score
dependencies.low_coupling	-0.56	-12.93
file_structure.single_responsibility	-0.52	-12.65
file_structure.line_count_under_300	-0.45	-9.49
code_smells.no_dead_code_after_return	-0.41	-23.19
scope_and_assignment.shadowed_by_inner_scope	-0.31	-5.08
file_structure.line_length_under_120	-0.30	-8.40
variable_naming.name_contains_type_suffix	-0.23	-2.26
variable_naming.loop_var_is_single_letter	-0.23	3.49
variable_naming.name_contains_and	-0.21	-36.60
consistency.same_concept_same_name	-0.21	-2.32

🟢 Readability — A (94/100)

Codebase averages: flesch_adapted=97.87, fog_adapted=4.82, avg_tokens_per_line=9.56, avg_line_length=35.81

Metric	Value	Score
readability.flesch_adapted	97.87	100
readability.fog_adapted	4.82	100
readability.avg_tokens_per_line	9.56	72
readability.avg_line_length	35.81	100

🔴 Complexity — D- (30/100)

Codebase averages: difficulty=41.56, effort=241776.21, volume=4110.78, estimated_bugs=1.37

Metric	Value	Score
halstead.difficulty	41.56	41
halstead.effort	241776.21	0
halstead.volume	4110.78	46
halstead.estimated_bugs	1.37	46

🟢 Structure — A- (88/100)

Codebase averages: branching_density=0.14, mean_depth=3.85, avg_function_lines=8.27, max_depth=9.17, max_function_lines=19.91, variance=6.77, avg_param_count=1.16, max_param_count=2.08

Metric	Value	Score
branching.branching_density	0.14	76
indentation.mean_depth	3.85	88
function_metrics.avg_function_lines	8.27	89
indentation.max_depth	9.17	87
function_metrics.max_function_lines	19.91	100
indentation.variance	6.77	100
function_metrics.avg_param_count	1.16	100
function_metrics.max_param_count	2.08	100

🟠 Duplication — C- (48/100)

Codebase averages: redundancy=0.59, bigram_repetition_rate=0.54, trigram_repetition_rate=0.37

Metric	Value	Score
compression.redundancy	0.59	58
ngram.bigram_repetition_rate	0.54	38
ngram.trigram_repetition_rate	0.37	40

🟢 Naming — A (96/100)

Codebase averages: entropy=0.89, mean=6.65, variance=18.75, avg_sub_words_per_id=1.17

Metric	Value	Score
casing_entropy.entropy	0.89	100
identifier_length_variance.mean	6.65	100
identifier_length_variance.variance	18.75	85
readability.avg_sub_words_per_id	1.17	100

🟢 Magic Numbers — A (100/100)

Codebase averages: density=0.00

Metric	Value	Score
magic_number_density.density	0.00	100

🔴 Combined Metrics — D (65/100)

Category	Score	Grade
Code Smells	25	🔴 D-
Consistency	82	🟡 B+
Dependencies	19	🔴 E+
Documentation	85	🟢 A-
Error Handling	91	🟢 A-
File Structure	48	🟠 C-
Function Design	82	🟡 B+
Naming Conventions	90	🟢 A-
Scope And Assignment	29	🔴 D-
Testing	83	🟡 B+
Type And Value	89	🟢 A-
Variable Naming	74	🟡 B

🔴 Code Smells — D- (25/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
no_dead_code_after_return	-0.41	25	D-

🟡 Consistency — B+ (82/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
consistent_function_style	0.39	82	B+

🔴 Dependencies — E+ (19/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
low_coupling	-0.56	19	E+

🟢 Documentation — A- (85/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 3 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
file_has_module_docstring	0.32	78	B+
docstring_is_nonempty	0.46	88	A-
function_has_docstring	0.47	88	A-

🟢 Error Handling — A- (91/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 3 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
error_message_is_descriptive	0.46	87	A-
does_not_swallow_errors	0.62	92	A-
returns_typed_error	0.66	93	A

🟠 File Structure — C- (48/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 5 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
single_responsibility	-0.52	20	E+
line_count_under_300	-0.45	24	E+
line_length_under_120	-0.30	30	D-
has_consistent_indentation	0.28	75	B
no_magic_numbers	0.58	92	A-

🟡 Function Design — B+ (82/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 3 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
is_less_than_20_lines	0.33	79	B+
has_verb_in_name	0.40	83	B+
no_magic_numbers	0.40	83	B+

🟢 Naming Conventions — A- (90/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
function_name_is_not_single_word	0.50	90	A-

🔴 Scope And Assignment — D- (29/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
shadowed_by_inner_scope	-0.31	29	D-

🟡 Testing — B+ (83/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 2 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
test_single_concept	0.28	75	B
test_name_describes_behavior	0.54	91	A-

🟢 Type And Value — A- (89/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
hardcoded_url_or_path	0.48	89	A-

🟡 Variable Naming — B (74/100)

Cosine similarity scores for 1 behaviors.

Behavior	Cosine	Score	Grade
name_is_generic	0.26	74	B

[github-actions]

---

kind: refactoring-tasks
path: /home/runner/work/codeqa-action/codeqa-action
timestamp: 2026-07-20T04:25:19.643251Z
overall_grade: C+
overall_score: 63
task_count: 0
critical: 0
high: 0
instructions: >-
Address the tasks below in order of severity (critical first).
After each fix, run the project's test suite and confirm it passes
before moving on.

No critical or high-severity blocks need attention. ✅