Skip to content

chore: update Go toolchain to 1.26.4#20

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
bot/go-toolchain-old-1244-28862855744from
bot/go-toolchain-auto-pr-1264-28862855744
Open

chore: update Go toolchain to 1.26.4#20
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
bot/go-toolchain-old-1244-28862855744from
bot/go-toolchain-auto-pr-1264-28862855744

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fork-only simulation of the future-standard automatically generated Go toolchain baseline update PR.

This PR was created by GitHub Actions using GITHUB_TOKEN, so the author should be github-actions[bot]. The base branch intentionally simulates an old but post-volcano-sh#391-style Go baseline: go.mod is the source of truth, workflows already use go-version-file: go.mod, and Docker golang:* builder tags are aligned with go.mod. The head branch was generated by the workflow and updates the project back to Go 1.26.4.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

NONE

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • Scope: fork-only automation rehearsal, not intended for upstream merge.
  • Automation identity: GitHub Actions GITHUB_TOKEN.
  • Validation in workflow: go mod tidy, git diff --check, exact 4-file changed list, and final tree comparison against upstream/main.
  • Note: a historical chore: update Go toolchain to 1.26.4 volcano-sh/agentcube#391-style 9-file migration also changes .github/workflows/*; GitHub rejects those workflow-file pushes from GITHUB_TOKEN unless a separate token/app has workflow-file permission. Future regular Go baseline updates should not need workflow file changes because chore: update Go toolchain to 1.26.4 volcano-sh/agentcube#391 already moved setup-go to go-version-file: go.mod.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants