Skip to content

Document developer workflow conventions - #14

Merged
speech115 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/document-dev-workflow
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

Document developer workflow conventions#14
speech115 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/document-dev-workflow

Conversation

@speech115

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add a "Developer Workflow Conventions" section to AGENTS.md covering branch naming, commit message style, attribution, and PR body structure — derived from this repo's actual git log/gh pr list history, not invented from a template.
  • Introduce claude/<topic-slug> as the branch prefix for Claude Code sessions, mirroring the repo's established codex/<topic-slug> convention (no Claude-specific prefix existed before).
  • Clarify that a prior approval to push directly to main does not carry forward to later commits.
  • Add a root-level CLAUDE.md (didn't exist before), following the canon-plus-summary pattern already used by mcp/CLAUDE.md / mcp/AGENTS.md: AGENTS.md stays canonical, CLAUDE.md is a condensed Claude-specific entrypoint with the same workflow essentials plus local commands.

Verification

  • ./scripts/safe-gate — MCP tests, control-plane tests (portable mode), agent docs sync drift, whitespace hygiene: all green.

GitHub context

  • Docs-only change, no runtime code touched.

…UDE.md

Derived branch naming, commit message style, attribution, and PR body
conventions from actual git/PR history instead of inventing new ones, and
gave Claude Code sessions a root-level entrypoint matching mcp/CLAUDE.md's
canon-plus-summary pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2d9da12275

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread AGENTS.md
Comment on lines +64 to +66
state or another open PR (see PR #13). This should satisfy
`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`'s checklist directly — fill it in, don't
leave it as unchecked boilerplate.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve the required PR template sections

When an agent follows this new PR-body guidance, it will produce only Summary/Verification/optional GitHub context, but .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md still requires the Layer, Checks, and Safety checklists. Saying this shape “should satisfy” the checklist makes future PRs omit those required boxes instead of filling them, so the workflow docs should either retain those template sections or explicitly instruct agents to fill the template alongside the summary.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@speech115
speech115 merged commit 3656528 into main Jul 1, 2026
2 checks passed
@speech115
speech115 deleted the claude/document-dev-workflow branch July 1, 2026 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant