Skip to content

chore: Bump actions#110

Draft
Techassi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/bump-actions
Draft

chore: Bump actions#110
Techassi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/bump-actions

Conversation

@Techassi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR bumps actions in CI and upstream actions used in our own actions.

  • Bump actions/checkout from v6.0.1 to v7.0.0
  • Bump actions/upload-artifact from v6.0.0 to v7.0.1
  • Bump actions/download-artifact from v7.0.0 to v8.0.1
  • Bump softprops/action-gh-release from v2.5.0 to v3.0.0
  • Bump docker/setup-buildx-action from v4.0.0 to v4.3.0
  • Bump sigstore/cosign-installer from v4.0.0 to v4.1.2
    This new version includes download retries, which is nice, because GitHub is flaky af these days and I observed download failures a bunch of times already.
  • Bump docker/login-action from v4.1.0 to v4.2.0
  • Bump cachix/install-nix-action from v31.9.0 to v31.10.6
  • Bump actions/setup-python from v6.1.0 to v6.2.0
  • Bump actions/cache from v5.0.1 to v5.0.5
  • Bump dtolnay/rust-toolchain

bb86a79 mentions us using a commit for Swatinem/rust-cache which doesn't exist upstream. This needs further investigation.

Techassi added 2 commits June 19, 2026 13:53
- Bump actions/checkout from v6.0.1 to v7.0.0
- Bump actions/upload-artifact from v6.0.0 to v7.0.1
- Bump actions/download-artifact from v7.0.0 to v8.0.1
- Bump softprops/action-gh-release from v2.5.0 to v3.0.0
- Bump dtolnay/rust-toolchain
- Bump docker/setup-buildx-action from v4.0.0 to v4.3.0
- Bump sigstore/cosign-installer from v4.0.0 to v4.1.2
- Bump docker/login-action from v4.1.0 to v4.2.0
- Bump cachix/install-nix-action from v31.9.0 to v31.10.6
- Bump actions/setup-python from v6.1.0 to v6.2.0
- Bump actions/cache from v5.0.1 to v5.0.5
- Bump actions/upload-artifact from v6.0.0 to v7.0.1
- Bump actions/download-artifact from v7.0.0 to v8.0.1

The Swatinem/rust-cache action was either using a) a wrong commit
since PR #105 was merged or b) the upstream repository rewrote
history. a) would be fine, b) would not.
@Techassi Techassi self-assigned this Jun 19, 2026
@Techassi Techassi moved this to Development: In Progress in Stackable Engineering Jun 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Development: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant