docs(release): add operator reproduction gate#73
Merged
Conversation
ac84599 to
048b540
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
docs/operator-reproduction.mdwith the shortest clone-to-artifact-regeneration pathscripts/check_release_contract.pyas a labeled wrapper around artifact regeneration, schema validation, and the full test suiteValidation
python -m pytest tests/test_release_contract_script.py: 2 passedpython -m pytest tests/test_reviewer_docs.py tests/test_markdown_links.py: 20 passedpython scripts/check_release_contract.py: artifact regeneration OK, schema validation 3 passed, full suite 181 passedgit diff --check: passed with CRLF warnings onlyBoundary
No new demo, no live ingestion, no production SIEM/dashboard/alert routing/case-management scope, no autonomous response, and no final incident verdict.