Skip to content

docs(kb): stuck vSAN repair after a node's storage controller fails#485

Open
CarlRodabaugh wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/kb-stuck-vsan-repair-hba
Open

docs(kb): stuck vSAN repair after a node's storage controller fails#485
CarlRodabaugh wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/kb-stuck-vsan-repair-hba

Conversation

@CarlRodabaugh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

New KB article for a vSAN condition where vSAN Repair Stuck alarms never clear and the tier stays non-redundant because a single node's storage HBA/RAID controller faulted and dropped all of that node's drives at once.

Key point: the repair does not self-heal onto the surviving nodes, and free space is irrelevant — the offline drives have to rejoin first. That distinguishes it from bad-block and out-of-space stuck repairs. Recovery is a cold power-cycle of the affected node (a warm reboot often won't clear a controller firmware fault), with a prominent caution not to take any other node in the tier offline while it's running non-redundant.

Type

Troubleshooting

Source

Recurring support pattern — two customer cases. Promoted from internal support KB.

Checks

  • validate_frontmatter.py passes locally
  • Internal links point at existing KB slugs (identifying-a-failed-disk-drive, removing-a-node-from-cluster)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

When a node's HBA/RAID controller hits a firmware fault, all of that
node's vSAN drives drop offline at once; the tier goes non-redundant and
the repair cannot complete until the drives rejoin (it will not rebuild
onto surviving nodes, and free space is irrelevant). Covers recognizing
it and recovering with a cold power-cycle, plus the non-redundant safety
caution.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant